Andrew v. White

Andrew v. White
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 21, 2025
Full case name	Brenda Evers Andrew v. Tamika White, Warden
Docket no.	23-6573
Citations	604 U.S. (more)
Opinion announcement	Opinion announcement
Holding
At the time of the decision of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, clearly established federal law provided that the erroneous admission of unduly prejudicial evidence could render a criminal trial fundamentally unfair in violation of due process; the judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinions
Per curiam
Concurrence	Alito
Dissent	Thomas, joined by Gorsuch

Andrew v. White, 604 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court vacated and remanded the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, holding that as established on Payne v. Tennessee, the Due Process Clause forbids the introduction of evidence so unduly prejudicial as to render a criminal trial fundamentally unfair.^[1][2]