Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Responsive image


Braintree Split

Braintree Split
Aerial image of the Braintree Split in 2019
Map
Location
BraintreeQuincy, Massachusetts
Coordinates42°13′37″N 71°01′16″W / 42.227°N 71.021°W / 42.227; -71.021
Roads at
junction
Construction
TypeFull Y
Maintained byMassachusetts Department of Transportation

The Braintree Split is the major interchange of Interstate 93 (I-93), U.S. Route 1 (US 1), and Route 3 in Braintree, Massachusetts, one of the South Shore suburbs of Boston. Traveling northbound, the routes merge into a three-way concurrency towards Boston. Traveling southbound, they divide into the concurrent I-93 and US 1 towards southeastern Massachusetts, and Route 3 towards Cape Cod.

The split is located close to the border between Braintree and Quincy. It was previously the southern terminus of Route 128, the main beltway around Boston; it shared the roadbed with I-93 and US 1 traveling towards the split before they join with Route 3. It was truncated to the junction of I-93 and I-95 in Canton in 1997; despite no longer carrying this designation, the split continues to be informally recognized as the starting point of Route 128 within Massachusetts.[1]

The Braintree Split is used as a focal point in local radio and television traffic reports.[2] In 2006, weekday traffic volume through the interchange averaged 250,000 to 275,000 vehicles daily.[3]

  1. ^ Chesto, Jon (August 13, 2012). "Despite federal and state agencies' efforts, a road by any other name is still Route 128". Wicked Local. Archived from the original on September 9, 2015. Retrieved June 30, 2017.
  2. ^ Weinreb, Michael, Traffic Report Archived December 3, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, Boston Magazine, May 2002.
  3. ^ "I-93/Southeast Expressway/Route 3 (Braintree Split): Operational Assessment and Potential Improvements" Archived September 19, 2010, at the Wayback Machine Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization, March 2006, p. 3.

Previous Page Next Page








Responsive image

Responsive image