Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Responsive image


David (Verrocchio)

David
Original in the Bargello, Florence
ArtistAndrea del Verrocchio
Year1473–1475
TypeBronze
Dimensions125 cm (49 in)
LocationMuseo Nazionale del Bargello, Florence

Andrea del Verrocchio's bronze statue of David was most likely made between 1473 and 1475. It was commissioned by the Medici family. It is sometimes claimed that Verrocchio modeled the statue after his pupil Leonardo da Vinci.[1]

The statue represents the youthful David, future king of the Israelites, triumphantly posed over the head of the slain Goliath. The bronze was initially installed in Palazzo Vecchio in 1476.[2] The ornament on David's leather tunic includes pseudo-Kufic letters imitating Arabic script.[3]

The placement of Goliath's head has been a source of some debate for art historians. When exhibited at the National Gallery of Art, the head was placed between David's feet,[2] as is the case in the statue's permanent home, the National Museum of the Bargello, in Florence, Italy. Another school of art historians have suggested that Verrocchio intended for Goliath's head to be placed to David's right, pointing to the diagonals of the ensemble. This placement was temporarily arranged at the National Gallery of Art, as well as Atlanta's High Museum, among others.

David was intended as a symbolic representation of Florence, as both were more powerful than they appeared, and both the shepherd boy and Florence could be viewed as rising powers.[2]

The Victoria & Albert Museum in London also owns a plaster cast of Verrocchio's David.

  1. ^ Walter Isaacson: Leonardo Da Vinci. Simon and Schuster, 2017, p. 36. (online on google books)
  2. ^ a b c "Understanding Verrocchio's David". High Museum of Art. Archived from the original on 26 October 2020. Retrieved 13 March 2020.
  3. ^ Mack, Rosamond E.; Zakariya, Mohamed (2009), "The Pseudo-Arabic on Andrea del Verrocchio's David", Artibus et Historiae, 30 (60): 157–172, JSTOR 25702885

Previous Page Next Page