Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Draft:Better Off Dead (Child novel)
| Submission declined on 28 January 2025 by PARAKANYAA (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. | &sq=crain_ford&lang=en&file=File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg){kind=logo} |
| Submission declined on 24 January 2025 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 17 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 24 January 2025 by RangersRus (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by RangersRus 17 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 23 January 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 18 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 22 January 2025 by Qcne (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include: Declined by Qcne 19 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 22 January 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 19 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 19 December 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 54 days ago. | |
Comment: Mostly unreferenced; please also remove any external links from the body. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 18:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: The reception has not sources. RangersRus (talk) 12:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Practically unreferenced, with zero evidence of notability. Cites the same two sources as the last time I reviewed this, the publisher's website, and a ChatGPT link which in itself is problematic. Please read and understand WP:NBOOK and provide evidence of notability, as well as proper support for the information presented, or expect this to be rejected outright. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:59, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
| Author | Lee Child and Andrew Child |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Series | Jack Reacher |
Release number | 26 |
| Genre | Thriller novel |
| Set in | Arizona, US |
| Publisher | Bantam Press (UK, Delacorte Press (US) |
Publication date | October 26th 2021 |
| Publication place | United Kingdom |
| Media type | Book |
| Pages | 448 |
| ISBN | 978-1787633735 |
| Preceded by | The Sentinel |
| Followed by | No Plan B |
Better Off Dead is the twenty-sixth book in the Jack Reacher series written by Lee Child. It is the second Jack Reacher book to be co-authored by James Grant and his younger brother Andrew Grant and published using their pen names of Lee Child and Andrew Child respectively.[1] [2][3]
Better off Dead was released on October 26th 2021, published by Penguin Random House and Bantam Press.[4] It is written in first person and is the first Reacher book which is co-authored by the Child brothers to be written in that point-of-view as the majority of Reacher books are written in the third-person
- ^ Rawlinson, Kevin (2020-01-18). "Jack Reacher series author Lee Child 'quits and lets brother step in'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2025-01-30.
- ^ "Jack Reacher author Lee Child passes writing baton to brother". BBC News. 2020-01-18. Retrieved 2025-01-23.
- ^ OpenLibrary.org. "Better Off Dead by Lee Child | Open Library". Open Library. Retrieved 2025-01-28.
- ^ Child, Lee Child,Andrew (2022-03-31). Better Off Dead.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Previous Page Next Page
