Draft:Paul Francis Buck

Submission declined on 4 February 2025 by Flat Out (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Flat Out 7 days ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here.

Submission declined on 29 August 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 18 June 2024 by Flemmish Nietzsche (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Flemmish Nietzsche 7 months ago.

• Comment: Large amounts of the draft are unsupported by sources. Please note subjects do not inherit notability from other subjects, so all the wiki links to other subjects, unless supported with a reference about the work they did together, do not add to notability. Also note, the article should be an accurate summary of what others have to say about the subject. Flat Out (talk) 01:54, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: This draft has a title that either has been disambiguated, or will need disambiguation to be accepted.
  If this draft is accepted, a disambiguation page will need to be created. (Review of the existing article or articles with the principal name indicates that a disambiguation page should be crated in place of the use of hatnotes alone.)
  The disambiguation page should be Paul Buck (disambiguation).
  If this draft is accepted, the redirect at Paul Buck should be converted to a disambiguation page. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: 1. Do not self-reference Wikipedia (WP:RSPWP) 2. Blogs, such as blogger, are not reliable sources. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 20:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Paul Francis Buck (born 10 August 1946) is a British poet, writer, translator and editor. He has been writing and publishing since the late Sixties with key titles that include Violations, Lust, Walking into Myself, Spread Wide, Performance, and A Public Intimacy. ‘His work is characterized by its sabotaging of the various forms in order to explore their overlaps and differences.’^[1]