Draft:WePlanet

Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,174 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · WePlanet (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 50 days ago by Steyncham (talk: D · +) · Last edited 0 seconds ago

Submission declined on 27 October 2024 by Tavantius (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Tavantius 3 months ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

• Comment: No sources supporting information on the lead section Jõsé^hola 12:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Many Guardian references are cited. The topic cannot solely depend on one news agency. I recommend you find those same sources with different news agencies or alternate sources; replace them with unqualified WP:GNG Guardian citations while keeping a few that qualify here. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 03:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Additionally, please see WP:CITEFOOT to fix where you place the citations. Tavantius (talk) 18:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

WePlanet

Founders	Amardeo Sarma,Rudy Rabbinge [nl]
Type	International NGO
Purpose	Environmentalism Conservation Ecology
Headquarters	August Reyerslaan 80, 1030 Brussels
Region	Worldwide
Methods	Advocacy Lobbying
President	Adam Blazowski
Secretary General	Karolina Lisslo Gylfe
Advisor	Mark Lynas
Website	weplanet.org

WePlanet is an alliance of environmental organizations from 18 countries^[1] (originally Finland, Sweden, Poland, Germany, France, Netherlands, Belgium, with newer branches being created in the UK, Portugal, Kenya, Uganda, Australia, Denmark, Norway, Ukraine, Italy, Bengladesh and Nigeria).

WePlanet was launched in the 2010s as "RePlanet", and was known under this name until 2023, when it had to change to "WePlanet" because of potential conflicts with existing brands as the movement expanded to new countries.^[2]