Katz v. United States | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued October 17, 1967 Decided December 18, 1967 | |
Full case name | Charles Katz v. United States, Leach-Lewis v. Bd. of Supervisors |
Citations | 389 U.S. 347 (more) 88 S. Ct. 507; 19 L. Ed. 2d 576; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2 |
Case history | |
Prior | 369 F.2d 130 (9th Cir. 1966); cert. granted, 386 U.S. 954 (1967). |
Holding | |
The Fourth Amendment's protection from unreasonable search and seizure extends to any area where a person has a "reasonable expectation of privacy." | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Stewart, joined by Warren, Douglas, Harlan, Brennan, White, Fortas |
Concurrence | Douglas, joined by Brennan |
Concurrence | Harlan |
Concurrence | White |
Dissent | Black |
Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. IV | |
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | |
Olmstead v. United States (1928) |
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court redefined what constitutes a "search" or "seizure" with regard to the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.[1][2] The ruling expanded the Fourth Amendment's protections from an individual's "persons, houses, papers, and effects," as specified in the Constitution's text, to include any areas where a person has a "reasonable expectation of privacy."[3] The reasonable expectation of privacy standard, now known as the Katz test, was formulated in a concurring opinion by Justice John Marshall Harlan II.[4]
The Katz test has since been used in numerous cases, particularly because of technological advances that create new questions about privacy norms and government surveillance of personal data.[5]