Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Responsive image


Klayman v. Obama

Klayman v. Obama
CourtUnited States District Court for the District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 16, 2013
DefendantsKlayman I: Verizon Communications, President Barack Obama, NSA director (General Keith B. Alexander), Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr., US District Judge Roger Vinson; Klayman II: Facebook, Yahoo!, Google, Microsoft, YouTube, AOL, PalTalk, Skype, Sprint, AT&T, Apple and the same government defendants as in Klayman I
Holding
Warrantless telecommunications surveillance is not permitted under the Fourth Amendment.
Court membership
Judge sittingRichard J. Leon

Klayman v. Obama, 957 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C., 2013), was a decision by the United States District Court for District of Columbia finding that the National Security Agency's (NSA) bulk phone metadata collection program was unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.[1] The ruling was later overturned on jurisdictional grounds, leaving the constitutional implications of NSA surveillance unaddressed.[2]

  1. ^ Klayman v. Obama, 957 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.C.D.C., 2013).
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference :0 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

Previous Page Next Page








Responsive image

Responsive image