Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
Mere addition paradox
| Part of a series on |
| Utilitarianism |
|---|
| Philosophy portal |
The mere addition paradox (also known as the repugnant conclusion) is a problem in ethics identified by Derek Parfit and discussed in his book Reasons and Persons (1984). The paradox identifies the mutual incompatibility of four intuitively compelling assertions about the relative value of populations. Parfit’s original formulation of the repugnant conclusion is that "For any perfectly equal population with very high positive welfare, there is a population with very low positive welfare which is better, other things being equal."[1]
- ^ Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Clarendon Press, 1984), p. 388.
Previous Page Next Page
