Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co. | |
---|---|
Argued April 28, 1953 Decided June 8, 1953 | |
Full case name | Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co. |
Citations | 346 U.S. 119 (more) 73 S. Ct. 981; 97 L. Ed. 1494; 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2688 |
Case history | |
Prior | On a complaint brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission under § 20 (b) of the Securities Act of 1933, seeking to enjoin respondent's unregistered offerings of its stock to its employees, the District Court held the exemption of § 4 (1) applicable and dismissed the suit. 102 F. Supp. 964. The Court of Appeals affirmed. 200 F.2d 85. The Supreme Court granted certiorari. 345 US. 903. |
Holding | |
SEC | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Clark, joined by Vinson, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Minton |
Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
Securities Act of 1933, § 4(1) |
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953),[1] was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a corporation offering "key employees" equity stock shares is eligible for a transaction-based exemption from securities registration under Section 4(1) [Now Section 4(a)(2)] of the Securities Act of 1933. This exemption would generally not apply when offered to all employees, including rank-and-file employees, as the investors should be "sophisticated investors."