Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Responsive image


Slack Technologies, LLC v. Pirani

Slack Technologies, LLC v. Pirani
Decided June 1, 2023
Full case nameSlack Technologies, LLC v. Pirani
Docket no.22-200
Citations598 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
To state a claim under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, a plaintiff must allege the purchase of "such security" issued pursuant to a materially misleading registration statement.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinion
MajorityGorsuch, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Securities Act of 1933

Slack Technologies, LLC v. Pirani, 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that to state a claim under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, a plaintiff must allege the purchase of "such security" issued pursuant to a materially misleading registration statement.[1][2]

  1. ^ Slack Technologies, LLC v. Pirani, No. 22-200, 598 U.S. ___ (2023).
  2. ^ "Justices limit suits challenging misleading securities registration statements". SCOTUSblog. June 1, 2023. Retrieved November 13, 2024.

Previous Page Next Page








Responsive image

Responsive image