Talk:Clandestine human intelligence

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Intelligence / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Intelligence task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Espionage Low‑importance Clandestine human intelligence is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Does the "i" in ideology really need to be in bold throughout the article? 24.252.50.236 (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it more readable. If you'd like to unbold all those MICE letters, it won't hurt my feelings. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 05:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I went though and removed a lot of bolded words, including these, because the bolding is distracting. I'm going to add a cleanup tag for a copyediting pass (I need a second opinion). RJFJR (talk) 21:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]