Talk:Dasaratha Jataka

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Buddhism Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Folklore Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Thank you all for guiding me. Some imperfections were quite expected as this is my first created article. But you all's advice is quite helpful. Earlier I thought there's no need to cite as I think information is common and will not lead to controversy. But I've cited it different souces now. I've write the synopis using various source but mistakenly cited the source where the name of the characters are not included, which might have confused you that it was original research. But I corrected it now.

I've improved many imperfections but still need you all's help. Can anyone please help me with hoe to improve the "notability" and "confusing" issue?JaMongKut (talk) 12:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]