Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Responsive image


Talk:Edo literature

Good articleEdo literature has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 4, 2023Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 10, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Edo literature was influenced by British colonialism in the late 19th century, which introduced the Roman script and Christianity to the Edo people?

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Edo literature/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Reading Beans (talk · contribs) 06:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination

[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 4, 2023, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass
2. Verifiable?: Pass
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
5. Stable? Pass
6. Images?: Pass

I could be missing something, but, whatever it is can not be so awful. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Reading Beans (talk) 15:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • In the Early period "Edegbe and others"—who are these people? I also think that the fourth paragraph should be placed in the second paragraph for chronological sake. 1910s comes before 1920s. Also, as noted in the subsequent section, you mentioned that Roman script wa adopted in the 1930s. Which script was used in the 1910s and 1920s?

This is the things I have seen so far. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 06:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans I have fixed the above. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Previous Page Next Page








Responsive image

Responsive image