Talk:Free good

This page was proposed for deletion by Closed Limelike Curves (talk · contribs) on 18 December 2024.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Economics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm not happy with the classification here: is this really how free goods are classified in some particular economics text, and if so, which text? I'm sure there are other ways they could be classified, and this article ought to reflect a real academic consensus, or at least accurately describe the different academic views. --Lee Daniel Crocker

What is/are the other classifications? -- Sam

In deciding whether to classify reclaimed waste products as a free good, would the cost of recycling or reusing be a factor? I think there are some cases where sending a product to the landfill or other disposal facility is cheaper than the recycling costs, at least in terms of immediate cash expenditure. Wesley

Recycling, really, is a production process (or a re-production process, if you like; though that wouldn't be the right word..). It incurs costs, and so is not a free good. Even if there was no need to recycle, the process of production would incur costs (even if that process is one of consumption).

However, the recycling of air, for example, is a free process (until we kill all the trees). So air is usually considered a free good; it incurs no cost to the supplier. (But I could be wrong.) -- Sam