Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Responsive image


United Kingdom parliamentary expenses scandal

The Palace of Westminster

The United Kingdom parliamentary expenses scandal was a major political scandal that emerged in 2009, concerning expense claims made by members of the British Parliament in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords over the previous years.[1] The disclosure of widespread misuse of allowances and expenses permitted to members of Parliament (MPs) aroused widespread anger among the UK public and resulted in a large number of resignations, sackings, de-selections and retirement announcements together with public apologies and the repayment of expenses. Several members, and former members, of both the House of Commons and the House of Lords were prosecuted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment.

A February 2008 Freedom of Information Act request for the release of details of MPs' expense claims was allowed by an Information Tribunal and was challenged by the House of Commons Authorities on the grounds that it was "unlawfully intrusive".[2] In May 2008 the High Court (England and Wales) ruled in favour of releasing the information.[3][4] In April 2009 the House of Commons authorities announced that publication of expenses, with certain information deemed "sensitive" redacted,[5] would be made available in July 2009.[6] However, before this could take place the expense records and documentation were leaked to The Daily Telegraph newspaper, which began publishing details in daily instalments from 8 May 2009. These disclosures dominated the British media for weeks. On 18 June 2009, the details of all MPs' expenses and allowance claims approved from 2004 to 2008 were published on the official Parliament website, but with some details removed, such as addresses, claims that were not approved for payment, and correspondence between MPs and the parliamentary fees office. This brought further accusations of unnecessary secrecy[7][8] and allegations that this might have prevented serious abuses from being disclosed.[5]

Since most claims revolved around MPs' second homes in London, a panel was established to investigate all claims relating to the "second homes" allowance between 2004 and 2008. Headed by former civil servant Sir Thomas Legg, the panel published its findings on 12 October as MPs returned to Westminster following the summer recess. Each MP received a letter stating whether or not he or she would be required to repay any expenses claimed. Details of voluntary repayments by MPs amounting to almost £500,000 were also officially published.[9]

It was announced on 5 February 2010 that criminal charges of false accounting[10] were to be prosecuted against four parliamentarians, all later jailed.[11] On 19 May charges were brought against two more, on 13 and 14 October 2010 two more faced legal proceedings. Three peers were suspended on 18 October 2010 due to their expenses claims.

  1. ^ "MP expenses leak 'not for money'". BBC News. 24 June 2009. Retrieved 8 May 2010.
  2. ^ Dawar, Anil (7 May 2008). "MPs fight to block expenses revelations". The Guardian. UK. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 19 May 2009. The House of Commons today asked the high court to block an "unlawfully intrusive" decision to force the publication of a detailed breakdown of MPs' expenses. The unprecedented legal challenge is against the Information Tribunal's ruling that a detailed breakdown of MPs' additional costs allowances (ACAs) must be provided under the Freedom of Information Act.
  3. ^ Corporate Officer of the House of Commons v Information Commissioner [2008] EWHC 1084 (Admin)
  4. ^ "MPs lose bid to hide expense claims from journalists". Press Gazette. 16 May 2008. Retrieved 15 May 2009.
  5. ^ a b Watson, Iain (9 May 2009). "Risks and gains of expenses leak". BBC News. Retrieved 19 May 2009. In July, we would have found out the nitty gritty of MPs' claims, but we wouldn't have been given their addresses. By obtaining the information unofficially—the Commons authorities say potentially illegally—the Telegraph has been able to check which properties politicians designate as a second home.
  6. ^ "Brown proposes expenses overhaul". BBC News. 21 April 2009. Retrieved 19 May 2009. The government wants changes in place by July—the same month all MPs' expense claims, with receipts, dating back to 2004 are due to be published after a long Freedom of Information battle.
  7. ^ Yeoman, Fran (18 June 2009). "How the censors filleted the meat out of MPs expense claims". The Times. UK. Retrieved 18 June 2009.[dead link]
  8. ^ "Allowances by MP". Westminster, United Kingdom: Parliament of the United Kingdom. 18 June 2009. Retrieved 18 June 2009.
  9. ^ "Repayment of Allowances by MP". Westminster, United Kingdom: Parliament of the United Kingdom. 19 June 2009. Archived from the original on 21 June 2009. Retrieved 19 June 2009.
  10. ^ "Three MPs and one peer to be charged over expenses". BBC News. 5 February 2010. Retrieved 11 April 2010.
  11. ^ "Politicians tell court they are not guilty on expenses". BBC News. 11 March 2010. Retrieved 11 April 2010.

Previous Page Next Page