Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Chico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The argument that a city councilor for a large city is inherently notable is a reasonable one based on first common sense, but as it is not codified - POLOUTCOMES does not count as codification - I cannot overrule counterarguments that holding such a position is insufficient, and in this case the latter argument has drawn more support. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:17, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]