Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment

Australia WikiProject
Main project page + talk Noticeboard Collaboration of the Fortnight Requested articles and todo talk  → Articles needing attention talk  → Nominations for deletion talk  → New articles talk Article assessment (Log) talk  → Featured and good content talk  → A-Class Review talk Outreach department talk Automation department talk Requested images Statistics talk Portal Help & tools talk
Project organisation Participants + talk Userboxes talk Project banner talk Project category talk
Subprojects General topics Biota talk Crime talk Demographics talk Education talk Films talk History talk  → Exploration talk  → Historic places talk  → Maritime history talk  → Military history talk Indigenous peoples talk Law talk Literature talk Music talk  → Crowded House talk  → Kylie Minogue talk  → Powderfinger talk Places talk Politics talk Sports talk Television talk Transport talk States, places and regions New South Wales talk  → Sydney talk  → Riverina talk Northern Territory talk Queensland talk South Australia talk  → Adelaide talk Tasmania talk Victoria talk  → Melbourne talk Western Australia talk  → Perth talk Australian Antarctic Territory talk Canberra talk Australian sports Australian rules football talk Baseball talk Basketball (possibly inactive) talk Football (soccer) talk Gridiron (possibly inactive) talk Rugby league talk Motorsport talk
edit · changes

Welcome to the article assessment department of WikiProject Australia. This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Australia articles.

Ratings are performed using the {{WP Australia}} project banner with additional parameters according to the quality of the article. When a parameter is used, the articles is placed into the appropriate sub-category of Category:Australia articles by quality and Category:Australia articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.