Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Responsive image


Wikipedia:WikiProject Former countries/Referendums

 Main Members Subprojects To do Article structure Referendums Edit 
WikiProject Former countries
General information (editchanges)
Main project page + talk
Members
Subprojects
Bureaus
Empires
Regions
Subdivisions
Task forces
Austria-Hungary
Chinese historical states
Empire of Brazil
Holy Roman Empire
Italian historical states
Rhodesia
Extraordinary governments (defunct)
Work groups
Austria-Hungary subdivisions
Former subdivisions
Article structure
Referendums
Departments
Assessment
Cartography
Templates
Project banner
{{Infobox country}}
{{Infobox former subdivision}}
Descendant WikiProjects
British Empire
Kingdom of Naples
Ottoman Empire
Prussia
Soviet Union
Yugoslavia

Articles requiring particular elements

Welcome to the Referendums Page of the Former Countries WikiProject!

On this page, new measures, changes, or referendums can be suggested and voted upon by the entire community. If you have an idea or change that you would like to suggest, just post it on this page and it will be voted upon via a "support/oppose/neutral" format. This voting system is simple: if a measure has a majority of "support votes", then it passes and will be adopted by the Project. But if it has a majority of "oppose" or "neutral" votes, then it fails. These measures can also be discussed on this page's discussion page.. So, vote away!

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the WikiProject Former countries. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was consensus to pass the motion. This proposal has open to comment for more than seven months, with only three editors taking part (all of whom supported the proposal). After such a long perod of time and such little editor involvement, three votes of support appears to be clear consensus in support of the proposal. Thus, it passes. Laurinavicius (talk) 00:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Previous Page Next Page








Responsive image

Responsive image