This template provides a simple conversion table from an IPA symbol to a Wikipedia article name.
The resulting article name should exist. The input symbol may be multiple characters, or may be a sequence of IPA-numbers.
This template has one parameter that is mandatory. The parameter can be an IPA symbol, or an IPA-number. Do not use template {{IPA}}
for the input character.
This may indicate that you have mistyped the input, or that the translation is not (yet) present in the IPAsym list. An editor can add the link.
{{IPA}}
template will break the workings:{{IPAsym|pʰɪk}}
→ Error using {{IPAsym}}: IPA symbol "pʰɪk" not found in list{{IPAsym|pʰɪk|unknown}}
→ unknown (parameter 2 used){{IPAsym|pʰɪk||}}
→ (empty string){{IPAsym|||input to be checked}}
→ input to be checked (using input position #3)Note: any symbol (that is, the single bunch of letters and diacritics) may only appear once in the template. If not, the template might produce unexpected results.
It is possible to map more than one symbol to the same sound. IPA-numbers for the symbol should be added in the same fashion. For clarity, please make them "fall through" to the last case, like this:
| 424 | ɑ̃ | ɛ̃ | œ̃ | ɔ̃ = nasal vowel
Important note on changing names
Most of the current output names correspond with the default soundfile name for that IPA-symbol:
If a name change away from e.g. this 'bilabial nasal' is needed, for example when the article has moved to another name, one should also add that change to ^^tlx>IPA audio filename}}, or change the name of the soundfile (source itself), using {{media rename}}
at the file Media:bilabial nasal.ogg. If this is omitted, the soundfile wil not be found any more, and a soundbutton is broken.
Just statistics:
advanced and retracted tongue root alveolar lateral ejective affricate IPA relative articulation#Advanced and retracted relative articulation#Raised and lowered roundedness Velarization voiceless palatal lateral fricative voiceless retroflex lateral fricative voiceless velar lateral fricative
In the same check, no repeated inputs were discovered (which would be bad and confusing).