![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,222 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 31 January 2025 by Bonadea (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 31 January 2025 by Taabii (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Taabii 7 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 31 January 2025 by Cinder painter (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Cinder painter 7 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 31 January 2025 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by KylieTastic 7 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 31 January 2025 by Rambley (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Rambley 7 days ago. | ![]() |
Given that the individual in question is 94 years old, it is understandable that internet-based sources are limited, as online documentation was not as prevalent during his time.That is certainly true! However, sources do not need to be online. More information at Wikipedia:Offline sources.The main page of the Sangeet Natak Akademi website fills no function here, since it does not mention Vasant Rambhau Sheolikar. If there is information about him on a specific page on the website, please link to that page.This is a good source to verify the award (better than this source), but it is not used as an actual source, with inline citations as explained previously. bonadea contributions talk 16:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Pandit Vasantrao Rambhau Sheolikar (born December 25, 1931) is an Indian violinist, renowned for his contributions to Hindustani Classical music. Born into a family with a rich musical background, he is known for adapting the violin to the Gayaki Ang style, often credited with bringing the violin instrument to prominence in Indian classical music. In 2023, he was awarded the Sangeet Natak Akademi Amrit Award[1] by the Government of India, with the honor presented by the Vice President of India.[2]
(Vasantrao Rambhau Sheolikar[3] is also known as, Vasant Sheolikar, V R Sheolikar)
![]() | |
Known as | Indian Violinist |
---|---|
Spouse | Pratibha Sheolikar |
Nationality | Indian |
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(help)