 |
Section size for Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory/Archive 19 (15 sections)
| Section name |
Byte
count |
Section
total
|
| (Top) |
67 |
67
|
| Heads up on new WSJ story re DOE assessment |
21,379 |
73,844
|
| Drafts of mentions in the lead and body |
12,310 |
12,310
|
| Other comments |
13,691 |
13,691
|
| DoE statement (again) |
2,144 |
2,144
|
| Why was this section removed? |
4,690 |
4,690
|
| '...in February 2023 suggested that COVID was likely a lab leak...' |
3,622 |
3,622
|
| 2023 DOE mention |
1,366 |
1,366
|
| DoE statement (again again) and less emphasis on Trump |
6,672 |
6,672
|
| Should we attribute the WSJ Feb 2023 report? |
1,992 |
1,992
|
| Should we emphasize the DoE and FBI more in the lead? |
5,978 |
5,978
|
| Requested edit |
3,833 |
3,833
|
| A second academic source whose authors are all subject to CCP control |
976 |
976
|
| Use of academic source whose authors are all subject to CCP control |
4,892 |
4,892
|
| Unwarranted Exclusion of Intermediate Lineage A-B SARS-CoV-2 Genomes Is Inconsistent with the Two-Spillover Hypothesis of the Origin of COVID-19 |
1,968 |
1,968
|
| Total |
85,580 |
85,580
|
| |
