 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,762 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 29 November 2024 by Dan arndt (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 22 September 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 3 months ago.
| |
Comment: Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Eaglercraft Gitea is a primary source and therefore not independent. YouTube, Reddit and GitHub are not acceptable or reliable sources. Dan arndt (talk) 05:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
 | |
| Original author(s) | LAX1DUDE, ayunami2000 |
|---|---|
| Stable release | EaglercraftX u45
/ December 14, 2024 |
| Repository | git |
| Written in | Java |
| Platform | Web Browser |
| Type | Sandbox, Survival |
Eaglercraft is a series of browser-based ports of Minecraft: Java Edition that are compiled into JavaScript using TeaVM,[1] along with an OpenGL emulator developed by LAX1DUDE to enable gameplay within web browsers.[2] Eaglercraft introduces several unique features not available in the original game, such as the ability to join LAN worlds remotely from any location, and integrated voice chat functionality through WebRTC.[3]
- ^ https://teavm.org/
- ^ "Tech's Role in Virtual World Building: A Look at Minecraft's Eaglercraft – Understanding Operating System Kernels". Retrieved 2024-11-29.
- ^ Hays, Edward (2023-04-28). "3 best Minecraft Eaglercraft servers". www.sportskeeda.com. Retrieved 2024-11-29.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.