Submission declined on 22 January 2025 by Qcne (talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Declined by Qcne 2 days ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author.
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here.
Comment: Vast majority of the sources are primary to Intact America's own website. Cut out all that content that's just linked to a primary source, and remove the sources that don't mention Intact American at all. Focus on finding three really strong secondary sources that provide significant coverage to the organisation without relying on an interview. qcne(talk) 22:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
The intactivist (anti-circumcision) organization’s position is that circumcision is genital cutting, and that the cutting or surgical alteration of the genitals of non-consenting minors (male, female, intersex, and non-binary) is unethical, medically unnecessary,[2] and traumatic. IA’s focus is on stopping newborn male circumcision. The organization argues that parental consent is poorly informed and often coerced,[3] and raises awareness that amputating the foreskin reduces sexual function and sensation.
“Intact America is the largest charitable organization in the U.S. working to end unnecessary genital cutting.”[30] Genital Autonomy America (previously known as the National Organizations for Circumcision Information Resource Centers or NOCIRC[31]) merged with IA in 2021. NOCIRC was founded in 1986 and is regarded as the first national, organized intactivist group.[32]
Intact America is a 501(c)(3) non-governmental advocacy organization. IA has a Guidestar Platinum 2024 Rating,[33] the highest level of recognition for commitment to transparency. The organization has no state or regional chapters, nor affiliates.
^Sardi, Lauren (2014). "Intactivism". In Kimmel, Michael; Milrod, Christine; Kennedy, Amanda (eds.). Cultural Encyclopedia of the Penis. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 94. ISBN978-0-7591-2312-0.
^Sheehan, Michael (October 11, 2018). "Controversies in Circumcision". In Quallich, Susanne; Lajiness, Michelle; Mitchell, Kenneth (eds.). Manual of men's health: a practice guide for APRNs and PAs. New York: Springer Publishing Company. p. 103. ISBN978-0-8261-9113-7.
^Meddings, Jonathan (October 17, 2022). The Final Cut: The Truth about Circumcision. (self-published). pp. 105–106. ISBN978-0645368208.
^Shelton, Deborah (August 27, 2009). "Under Knife, under Scrutiny". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on September 28, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2024.
^Allan, Jonathan (November 5, 2024). Uncut: A Cultural Analysis of the Foreskin (The Exquisite Corpse). University of Regina Press. p. 266. ISBN978-1779400314.
^"Intact America, Inc". Guidestar. September 1, 2024. Archived from the original on December 13, 2024. Retrieved October 24, 2024.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.