| Submission declined on 18 January 2025 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 30 July 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CFA 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 25 October 2023 by Ca (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Ca 15 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 11 July 2023 by Jamiebuba (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Jamiebuba 18 months ago. | |
Comment: Doesn't meet WP:NJOURNALIST. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 02:03, 18 January 2025 (UTC)Hmm, it would look like WP:NJOURNALIST.3 is satisfied, because Dugmore is the head of politics on Joe (website) with the politics videos attracting 100s of millions of views, and was the subject of interview by Amol Rajan on BBC'sThe Media Show and the subject of an article in Cherwell (newspaper). So the clauses in criterion 3 look to be met.Chumpih t 06:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: This is a press release, not independent. In the articles covering the The Egg story, Dugmore is only tangetially discussed and gives no biographical info about this person. He is cited once or twice, but none of the article discusses him as a person. More in-depth sources are needed. Ca talk to me! 10:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Oli Dugmore is a journalist and broadcaster..[1] He has appeared frequently on UK television as political commentator, and has spoken alongside Nancy Pelosi at the Oxford Union.[2] He is a radio presenter on LBC with a weekly slot. He is the head of News and Politics at the JOE website,[3][4] and it is through this site and its associated YouTube and podcast streams that he has interviewed many prominent people, including Jeremy Corbyn, Ian Hislop. Sadiq Kahn amd Rory Stewart [5] He has been a pundit on several BBC political, current affairs and media shows, including Newsnight,[6] Laura Kuenssberg's on TV, Jeremy Vine's on Radio 2 and Amol Rajan's on Radio 4.[7]
- ^ Lyon, Ali (30 June 2024). "What the rise of Politics Joe says about young people's relationship with the news?". CityAM. Retrieved 2024-10-08.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
pelosiwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Sandall, Adam Saxon and Oliver (26 June 2024). "In conversation with Oli Dugmore, the mind behind PoliticsJOE". Cherwell. Retrieved 2024-07-08.
- ^ "Oli Dugmore". JOE.ie. Retrieved 2023-04-03.
- ^ "'Your copy should read like a WhatsApp message': How to create content for and with Gen Z". newsrewired.com. 25 May 2022.
- ^ "Newsnight - Has Starmer Signalled Austerity 2.0?". BBC. 2024-08-27. Retrieved 20 October 2024.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
rajanwas invoked but never defined (see the help page).