House v. Bell

House v. Bell
Argued January 11, 2006
Decided June 12, 2006
Full case namePaul Gregory House, Petitioner v. Ricky Bell, Warden
Docket no.04-8990
Citations547 U.S. 518 (more)
126 S. Ct. 2064; 165 L. Ed. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 4674
Case history
Prior311 F.3d 767 (6th Cir. 2002); cert. denied, 539 U.S. 937 (2003); 386 F.3d 668 (6th Cir. 2004); cert. granted, 545 U.S. 1151 (2005).
Holding
Post-conviction DNA forensic evidence can be considered in death penalty appeals.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · David Souter
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Case opinions
MajorityKennedy, joined by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Concur/dissentRoberts, joined by Scalia, Thomas
Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. IV

House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case challenging the permissibility of new DNA forensic evidence that becomes available post-conviction, in capital punishment appeals when those claims have defaulted pursuant to state law.[1] The Court found that admitting new DNA evidence was in line with Schlup v. Delo (1995),[2] which allows cases to be reopened in light of new evidence.

  1. ^ House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518 (2006). Public domain This article incorporates public domain material from this U.S government document.
  2. ^ Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298 (1995).

House v. Bell

Dodaje.pl - Ogłoszenia lokalne