Back Правен реализъм Bulgarian Rechtsrealismus German Realismo jurídico Spanish Oikeusrealismi Finnish Réalisme juridique French ריאליזם משפטי HE Realismo giuridico Italian リアリズム法学 Japanese Rechtsrealisme Dutch Realizm prawniczy Polish
 | This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (March 2009) |
| Judicial interpretation |
|---|
| Forms |
| General rules of interpretation |
| General theories of interpretation |
Legal realism is a naturalistic approach to law; it is the view that jurisprudence should emulate the methods of natural science; that is, it should rely on empirical evidence. Hypotheses must be tested against observations of the world.[citation needed]
Legal realists believe that legal science should only investigate law with the value-free methods of natural sciences, rather than through philosophical inquiries into the nature and meaning of the law that are separate and distinct from the law as it is actually practiced. Indeed, legal realism asserts that the law cannot be separated from its application, nor can it be understood outside of its application. As such, legal realism emphasizes law as it actually exists, rather than law as it ought to be. Locating the meaning of law in places such as legal opinions issued by judges and their deference to or dismissal of precedent and the doctrine of stare decisis, it stresses the importance of understanding the factors involved in judicial decision-making.
In Scandinavia Axel Hägerström developed another realist tradition that was influential in European jurisprudential circles for most of the 20th century.[1]