Talk:Penrose interpretation

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative views Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics on Penrose Interpretation are hard to find, if anybody knows the mathematics behind it, could you please add it to the article. D Hill 12:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the illustration sucks monkey chunks, you can't even read the writing. Pthag 21:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kevin aylward

Removed the “modern physics claims that the mirror will be in two places at once” phrase. The physically existence of two real states existing at once is speculation, and not a requirement of the mathematics of QM.