WikiProject Higher education
|
|
Main pages
|
Main project
|
talk
|
Participants
|
Participants category
|
talk
|
Project category
|
talk
|
Infobox
|
talk
|
Manual of style
|
Article guideline
|
talk
|
Templates
|
Higher education stubs
|
talk
|
Departments
|
Assessment
|
talk
|
Collaboration of the Month (inactive)
|
talk
|
Outreach (inactive)
|
talk
|
Articles
|
List of articles
|
talk
|
Accomplishments
|
Articles for Deletion
|
Archive
|
Clean-up List
|
Popular pages
|
Task Forces
|
Student Affairs
|
talk
|
Statistics
|
Higher education pages by quality
|
Quality
|
Total
|
FA
|
45
|
FL
|
61
|
FM
|
25
|
A
|
1
|
GA
|
230
|
B
|
1,260
|
C
|
4,490
|
Start
|
17,321
|
Stub
|
15,518
|
List
|
1,990
|
Category
|
30,147
|
Disambig
|
131
|
File
|
5,179
|
Project
|
48
|
Template
|
2,077
|
NA
|
2,223
|
Assessed
|
80,746
|
Unassessed
|
2,115
|
Total
|
82,861
|
WikiWork factors (?)
|
ω = 201,909
|
Ω = 5.20
|
|
Things To Do
|
- Work on articles that need cleanup.
- Create a page for every university and college and add {{infobox University}} for it. See the missing list for those institutions still awaiting articles.
- Place {{WikiProject Higher education}} on every related talk page.
- Combat boosterism wherever it appears
- Ensure all articles, including Featured articles, are consistent with the article guidelines.
|
Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject Higher education! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Universities and College articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Higher education}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Higher education articles by quality, Category:Higher education articles needing attention, and Category:Higher education collaborations. The quality ratings serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.